Model of Toughness Measurement of Non-performing Loans Collection; Case Study: Bank Mellat

Jalali Farahani, Alireza; Mirzaee, Fatemeh Sadat; Sadi, Farhad; Arminfar, Fatemeh

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

For Authors

Submission Instruction

Submission Form

For Reviewers

Reviewers Section

Registration

Registration Information

Contact us

Site Facilities

MBRI Journals

Journal of Money & Economy

(رتبه علمی-پژوهشی)

Related Journals

Journal of Islamic Finance Research

(Biannual)

Search in website

Receive site information

year 17, Issue 62 (2-2025)

JMBR 2025, 17(62): 625-655

Back to browse issues page

Model of Toughness Measurement of Non-performing Loans Collection; Case Study: Bank Mellat

Alireza Jalali Farahani¹

, Fatemeh Sadat Mirzaee ^*¹

, Farhad Sadi¹

, Fatemeh Arminfar¹

1- Bank Mellat

Abstract: (81 Views)

This research has been done with the aim of evaluating bank non-performing loans from the point of view of the level of difficulty in collecting the debts related to them. In the first part, which includes the preparation of a tree structure including the factors and characteristics that determine the difficulty of NPL cases, library studies, in-depth interviews, semi-structured interviews and Delphi sessions have been used, and in the second part, the purpose of which is to determine the effectiveness and desirability of the mentioned factors and characteristics. AHP and BWM methods have been used to analyze the opinions of 50 experts in the field of credit and collection of bank debts. Expert choice and Python software were used to perform the analysis. Three factors of facility and debtor's background, collection tools, and debtor's non-current debt status were identified as the main effective factors in the difficulty of debt recovery and were divided into 40 effective sub-factors in a tree structure. The possibility of seizing, acquiring and selling the client's immovable property was determined to be the most important factor in the evaluation of the case. With the model obtained in this research, it is possible to evaluate all the bank claims files and grade their difficulty levels.

Article number: 3

Full-Text [PDF 1707 kb] (36 Downloads)

Type of Study: Case Study | Subject: Financial Institutions and Services (G2)
Received: 2024/10/20 | Accepted: 2025/02/4 | Published: 2025/04/13

References

1. ابدالی، ع.، خادم، س.، و جاریانی، ک. (1399). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر معوق شدن مطالبات بانک قوامین (مورد مطالعه: استان خراسان شمالی). کنفرانس علمی پژوهشی دستاوردهای نوین در مطالعات علوم مدیریت، حسابداری و اقتصاد ایران. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/900173/fa

2. ابراهیم‌زاده، م. (2019). بررسی عوامل مؤثر در وصول مطالبات سررسید گذشته و معوق بانک‌ها ‌(مطالعهٔ موردی: شعب بانک مهر اقتصاد غرب استان مازندران). مطالعات نوین بانکی، 2(2)، 289-312.‎

3. ابوالحسنی، م.، صمدی، س.، و واعظ برزانی، م. (1400). تعیین اثرات کوتاه‌مدت و بلندمدت متغیرهای کلان اقتصادی و بانکی بر حجم مطالبات معوق بانک‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران (1396-1386). فصلنامهٔ مطالعات اقتصادی کاربردی ایران، 10(37)، 201-233.

4. ابوالحسنی، ا.، شایگانی، ب.، و جمشیدنژاد، ا. (1400). بررسی اثر مطالبات غیرجاری بانک‌های دولتی و خصوصی بر رشد اقتصادی ایران. پژوهشنامهٔ اقتصاد کلان Macroeconomics Research Letter, 16(31), 155-178. doi: 10.22080/iejm.2022.21981.1869

5. بخشنامهٔ شماره مب/2823 مورخ 05/12/1385 بانک مرکزی

6. حمیدیان، م.، بن گریز، ف.، و ابوالفتحی، ح.. (1397). شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی ابزارهای تشویقی مؤثر بر وصول مطالبات بانکی (مطالعه موردی: بانک تجارت در استان خوزستان). پژوهشنامهٔ اقتصاد و کسب‌وکار، پیاپی 20 40-56.

7. قاسم‌دخت، ن.، رضوی، ح. (1402). مدیریت ریسک تضامین در یک مؤسسهٔ‌ مالی. پژوهش‌های اقتصادی ایران، 28(95)، 157-192.

8. کردمنجیری، س.، داداشی، ا.، خشنود، ز.، و غلام نیاروشن، ح. (1399). شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر مطالبات غیرجاری بانک‌ها ‌با استفاده از شبکه‌های ‌عصبی و الگوریتم ماشین بردار پشتیبان. مدلسازی اقتصادی، 14(1 (پیاپی 49))، 127-151. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/393548/fa

9. گودرزی، ا.، رضایی زاده، م.، ولی‌خانی، م.، و شیروانی جوزدانی، ع. (1401). اولویتبندی مؤلفه‌های ‌وصول مطالبات معوق در سیاستگذاری نظام مالی بانک سپه، https://civilica.com/doc/1569092

10. Asfaw, A. S., Bogale, H. N., & Teame, T. T. (2016). Factors affecting non-performing loans: case study on development bank of Ethiopia central region. International journal of scientific and research publications, 6(5), 656-670.

11. Atoi, N. V. (2018). Non-performing loan and its eﬀects on banking stability: Evidence from national and international licensed banks in Niger. CBN Journal of Applied Statistics (JAS), 9(2), 3. [DOI:10.33429/Cjas.09218.3/6]

12. Bellotti, A., Brigo, D., Gambetti, P., & Vrins, F. (2021). Forecasting recovery rates on non-performing loans with machine learning. International Journal of Forecasting, 37(1), 428-444. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.06.009]

13. Berger, A. N., Frame, W. S., & Ioannidou, V. (2016). Reexamining the empirical relation between loan risk and collateral: The roles of collateral liquidity and types. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 26, 28-46. [DOI:10.1016/j.jfi.2015.11.002]

14. Fianto, B. A., Maulida, H., & Laila, N. (2019). Determining factors of non-performing financing in Islamic microfinance institutions. Heliyon, 5(8). [DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02301] [PMID] []

15. European Central Bank. (2017). Guidance to banks on non-performing loans. Guidance to Banks on Non-Performing Loans. Banking Supervision Division, 1-131.

16. Leonard, Natalie (2021). Turkey saving deposit insurance fund bank recapitalization (2000-2001). The Journal of Financial Crises: 3(3), 705-719, 2021, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3981879 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3981879 [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3981879]

17. Louzis, D. P., Vouldis, A. T., & Metaxas, V. L. (2012). Macroeconomic and bank-specific determinants of non-performing loans in Greece: A comparative study of mortgage, business and consumer loan portfolios. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(4), 1012-1027. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.10.012]

18. Nawai, N., & Shariff, M. N. M. (2010). Determinants of repayment performance in microcredit programs: A review of literature. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 1(2).

19. Ozili, P. K. (2019). Non-performing loans and financial development: New evidence. The Journal of Risk Finance, 20(1), 59-81. [DOI:10.1108/JRF-07-2017-0112]

20. Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49-57. [DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009]

21. Sahoo, S. K., & Goswami, S. S. (2023). A comprehensive review of multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods: Advancements, Applications, and Future Directions. Decision Making Advances, 1(1), 25-48. [DOI:10.31181/dma1120237]

22. Sivamayilvelan, K., Rajasekar, E., Vairavasundaram, S., Balachandran, S., & Suresh, V. (2024). Flexible recommendation for optimizing the debt collection process based on customer risk using deep reinforcement learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 124951. [DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124951]

23. Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77-87. [DOI:10.3390/encyclopedia3010006]

24. Ye, H., & Bellotti, A. (2019). Modelling recovery rates for non-performing loans. Risks, 7(1), 19. [DOI:10.3390/risks7010019]

25. Zanoni, M., Antonijevic, M., Fenu, A., Palmisano, A., & Redaelli, R. (2019). NPL classification a random forest approach.

26. Zhang, D., Cai, J., Dickinson, D. G., & Kutan, A. M. (2017). Non-performing loans, moral hazard and regulation of the Chinese commercial banking system. Journal of Banking & finance, 63, 48-60. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.11.010]

27. Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Scheffel, E., & Zhao, Y. (2022). A key driver for the mixed relationship between loan risk premiums and collateral: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102206. [DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102206]

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

year 17, Issue 62 (2-2025)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710